CO129-355 - Governor Sir Lugard - 1909 [1-3] — Page 132

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

COPY.

Enclosure 2.

OCI

# Minute by Sir Henry Berkeley.

Hon. Colonial Secretary,

13th January, 1883

I have considered the question submitted by His Excellency the Governor in his minute of 12th December, and am of the following opinion:-

1. Spring Gardens is outside the scope and intention of the Agreement relating to Colonial Military Crown Lands based upon Colonel Lewis's memorandum inasmuch as that Agreement embraces "Colonial Crown Lands" only and does not include lands leased or purchased by the War Department from private persons.

2. Spring Gardens is, so far as regards the title of the War Department thereto, in the same category as "Mount Austin Barracks" described by Colonel Lewis as "Lease-hold property" (page 2 statement of particulars) and should have been similarly described.

3. The error in describing Spring Gardens as "freehold" (page 6 statement of particulars) is apparently due to the fact that Colonel Lewis did not see the records relating to its acquisition by the War Department and was under the impression that there were none (page 6 statement of particulars) whereas as a fact the original Crown Lease and the subsequent assignment thereof to the War Department are both on the register.

Edit History

2026-06-07 19:25:20 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
COPY. Enclosure 2. OCI # Minute by Sir Henry Berkeley. Hon. Colonial Secretary, 13th January, 1883 I have considered the question submitted by His Excellency the Governor in his minute of 12th December, and am of the following opinion:- 1. Spring Gardens is outside the scope and intention of the Agreement relating to Colonial Military Crown Lands based upon Colonel Lewis's memorandum inasmuch as that Agreement embraces "Colonial Crown Lands" only and does not include lands leased or purchased by the War Department from private persons. 2. Spring Gardens is, so far as regards the title of the War Department thereto, in the same category as "Mount Austin Barracks" described by Colonel Lewis as "Lease-hold property" (page 2 statement of particulars) and should have been similarly described. 3. The error in describing Spring Gardens as "freehold" (page 6 statement of particulars) is apparently due to the fact that Colonel Lewis did not see the records relating to its acquisition by the War Department and was under the impression that there were none (page 6 statement of particulars) whereas as a fact the original Crown Lease and the subsequent assignment thereof to the War Department are both on the register.
Baseline (Original)
OPY. Enclosure 2. OCI ant Luxo notathroo #* Tebnu bus asongatɛ worło sit at trommaro" 131 Minnte by Sir Henry Berkeley. wilt to tertel a'itte? sɗroots" o riqatnaraq .bas and mi bo- Hon. Colonial Secretary, Viamat, to .5-3 I have considered the question/ submitted by ah esit ni misur bijoda xneqong erz na "not oa vo* Jner- His Excellency the Governor in his minute of 12th. December, se molar""anon a ke hubnanet of dyes doesthaqat 8" 8:1 and am of the following opinion:- char conaten duenaproq azi of vnofen 1.. feteoro * Spring Gardens is outside the scope and intention of the Agreement relating to Colonial Military Crown Lends based upon Colonel Lewis's '', emorandum inasmuch as that Agreement embraces "Colonial Crown Lands" only and does not include lands leased or purchased by the Var Department from private persons. 2. Spring Gardens is, so far as regards the title of the War Department thereto, in the same caterory as "Mount Austin Barracks" described by Colonel Lewis as "Lease- -hold property" (page 2 statement of particulars) and should have been similarly described. "freehold 3. The error in describing Spring Gardens as 1" (page 6 statement of particulars) is apparently due to the fact that Colonel Lewis did not see the records relating to its acquisition by the "ar Department and was under the impression that there were none (page 6 statement of particulars) whereas as a fact the original Crown Lease and the subsequent assignment thereof to the War Department are both on the register
2026-06-07 19:25:20 · Baseline
View content

OPY.

Enclosure 2.

OCI

ant Luxo notathroo

#* Tebnu bus asongatɛ worło sit at trommaro"

131

Minnte by Sir Henry Berkeley.

wilt to tertel a'itte? sɗroots"

o riqatnaraq .bas and mi bo-

Hon. Colonial Secretary,

Viamat, to .5-3

I have considered the question/ submitted by

ah

esit ni misur bijoda xneqong erz na "not oa vo* Jner-

His Excellency the Governor in his minute of 12th. December,

se molar""anon

a ke hubnanet of dyes doesthaqat

8" 8:1

and am of the following opinion:-

char conaten duenaproq azi of vnofen

1..

feteoro

*

Spring Gardens is outside the scope and

intention of the Agreement relating to Colonial Military Crown

Lends based upon Colonel Lewis's '', emorandum inasmuch as that

Agreement embraces "Colonial Crown Lands" only and does not

include lands leased or purchased by the Var Department from

private persons.

2.

Spring Gardens is, so far as regards the

title of the War Department thereto, in the same caterory as

"Mount Austin Barracks" described by Colonel Lewis as "Lease-

-hold property" (page 2 statement of particulars) and should

have been similarly described.

"freehold

3.

The error in describing Spring Gardens as

1" (page 6 statement of particulars) is apparently due

to the fact that Colonel Lewis did not see the records relating

to its acquisition by the "ar Department and was under the

impression that there were none (page 6 statement of particulars)

whereas as a fact the original Crown Lease and the subsequent

assignment thereof to the War Department are both on the

register

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.